Powered by AppSignal & Oban Pro
Would you like to see your link here? Contact us

Day 6 - Advent of Code 2023

lib/advent_of_code/2023/day-06.livemd

Day 6 - Advent of Code 2023

Mix.install([:kino, :benchee])

Links

Input

input = Kino.Input.textarea("Please paste your input file:")
input = input |> Kino.Input.read()
# input = AdventOfCode.Input.get!(6, 2023)
"Time:        48     87     69     81\nDistance:   255   1288   1117   1623"

Solution

defmodule Day06 do
  defdelegate parse(input), to: __MODULE__.Input

  def part1(input) do
    input
    |> parse()
    |> Enum.zip()
    |> Enum.map(&calc_num_ways/1)
    |> Enum.product()
  end

  def part2(input) do
    input
    |> parse()
    |> Enum.map(&(&1 |> Enum.join() |> String.to_integer()))
    |> List.to_tuple()
    |> calc_num_ways()
  end

  def calc_num_ways({b, c}) do
    low = (b - :math.sqrt(b * b - 4 * c)) / 2
    high = (b + :math.sqrt(b * b - 4 * c)) / 2

    ceil(high) - floor(low) - 1
  end

  defmodule Input do
    def parse(input) when is_binary(input) do
      ~r/Time:\s*([\d\s]+)\nDistance:\s*([\d\s]+)/
      |> Regex.run(input, capture: :all_but_first)
      |> parse()
    end

    def parse(input) do
      input
      |> Enum.map(&parse_line/1)
    end

    def parse_line(line) do
      line
      |> String.split(" ", trim: true)
      |> Enum.map(&String.to_integer/1)
    end
  end
end
{:module, Day06, <<70, 79, 82, 49, 0, 0, 12, ...>>,
 {:module, Day06.Input, <<70, 79, 82, ...>>, {:parse_line, 1}}}

Determine the number of ways you could beat the record in each race. What do you get if you multiply these numbers together?

Your puzzle answer was 252000.

Day06.part1(input)
252000

How many ways can you beat the record in this one much longer race?

Your puzzle answer was 36992486.

Day06.part2(input)
36992486

Both parts of this puzzle are complete! They provide two gold stars: **

At this point, you should return to your Advent calendar and try another puzzle.

If you still want to see it, you can get your puzzle input.

Tests

ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)

defmodule Day06Test do
  use ExUnit.Case, async: false

  setup_all do
    [
      input: "Time:      7  15   30\nDistance:  9  40  200"
    ]
  end

  describe "part1/1" do
    test "returns expected value", %{input: input} do
      assert Day06.part1(input) == 288
    end
  end

  describe "part2/1" do
    test "returns expected value", %{input: input} do
      assert Day06.part2(input) == 71503
    end
  end
end

ExUnit.run()
..
Finished in 0.00 seconds (0.00s async, 0.00s sync)
2 tests, 0 failures

Randomized with seed 924235
%{total: 2, failures: 0, excluded: 0, skipped: 0}

Benchmarking

# https://github.com/bencheeorg/benchee
Benchee.run(
  %{
    "Part 1" => fn -> Day06.part1(input) end,
    "Part 2" => fn -> Day06.part2(input) end
  },
  memory_time: 2,
  reduction_time: 2
)

nil
Warning: the benchmark Part 1 is using an evaluated function.
  Evaluated functions perform slower than compiled functions.
  You can move the Benchee caller to a function in a module and invoke `Mod.fun()` instead.
  Alternatively, you can move the benchmark into a benchmark.exs file and run mix run benchmark.exs

Warning: the benchmark Part 2 is using an evaluated function.
  Evaluated functions perform slower than compiled functions.
  You can move the Benchee caller to a function in a module and invoke `Mod.fun()` instead.
  Alternatively, you can move the benchmark into a benchmark.exs file and run mix run benchmark.exs

Operating System: macOS
CPU Information: Apple M1 Pro
Number of Available Cores: 10
Available memory: 32 GB
Elixir 1.15.6
Erlang 26.1

Benchmark suite executing with the following configuration:
warmup: 2 s
time: 5 s
memory time: 2 s
reduction time: 2 s
parallel: 1
inputs: none specified
Estimated total run time: 22 s

Benchmarking Part 1 ...
Benchmarking Part 2 ...

Name             ips        average  deviation         median         99th %
Part 1      432.90 K        2.31 μs   ±519.91%        2.17 μs        2.58 μs
Part 2      380.22 K        2.63 μs   ±449.47%        2.50 μs        2.92 μs

Comparison: 
Part 1      432.90 K
Part 2      380.22 K - 1.14x slower +0.32 μs

Memory usage statistics:

Name      Memory usage
Part 1         2.62 KB
Part 2         2.88 KB - 1.10x memory usage +0.26 KB

**All measurements for memory usage were the same**

Reduction count statistics:

Name   Reduction count
Part 1             303
Part 2             395 - 1.30x reduction count +92

**All measurements for reduction count were the same**
nil