ExUnit
Mix.install([
{:jason, "~> 1.4"},
{:kino, "~> 0.9", override: true},
{:youtube, github: "brooklinjazz/youtube"},
{:hidden_cell, github: "brooklinjazz/hidden_cell"}
])
Navigation
Home Report An Issue Games: Rock Paper ScissorsGames: WordleReview Questions
Upon completing this lesson, a student should be able to answer the following questions.
- How do we effectively organize and name our tests?
- How do we use assertions to write robust tests?
Testing
We test to ensure our code behaves as expected.
Automated tests automate the process of manually testing our code and verify our code continues to behave as expected.
Without tests, it’s easy to introduce breaking changes. With tests, when something breaks, the automated test suite catches issue and facilitates debugging by providing useful feedback.
> We test to increase confidence that our software does what it’s > supposed to do. Testing gives us confidence that our code works as expected. > This is true for all kinds of testing, whether for automated tests performed > by a machine or for manual tests performed by a human. > > * Testing Elixir by Andrea Leopardi and Jeffrey Matthias
Testing Input And Output
Tests can be brittle, meaning that as you change your codebase, tests will fail frequently. Typically, tests are brittle because they test implementation rather than behavior.
Think of behavior as the input and output of your function, and the implementation is the black box within it.
flowchart
subgraph Behavior
subgraph BB[Black Box]
Implementation
end
Input --> BB --> Output
end
Our tests should concern themselves with the behavior of our code, not the internal details. Easier said than done, however as a general rule if refactoring your code (making improvements without changing behavior) breaks your tests, then you are likely testing implementation.
For now, focus on testing the Input of your code, and asserting on it’s Output.
For example, if we were testing a double/1
function that doubles a number, we would test that when given a number such as 3
it would return 6
.
flowchart LR
2 --> double/1 --> 4
ExUnit
ExUnit is a built-in test framework for Elixir.
Let’s look at a very minimal test.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule ExampleTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "truthy" do
assert true
end
end
ExUnit.run()
-
First, we start ExUnit. In a mix project, this step is handled in our
test_helpers.ex
file for us. In Livebook, we have to start it manually. -
Next we define a test module. Generally, if we’re writing tests for a specific module we’ll name it
ModuleNameTest
, so tests for a module calledGreeter
would be in aGreeterTest
module. -
The next line,
use ExUnit.Case
, generates some code from the ExUnit.Case module, which gives us access to the test/3 and assert/1 macros as well as other testing tools. -
test/3 is a macro that defines a single test. test/3 accepts the name of the test as a string, in this case
"truthy"
. - assert/1 is a macro that makes a single assertion inside of the test. The test passes if it receives a truthy value and fails if it receives any falsy value.
A test can contain many assertions, and a test module can have many tests.
Assertions
ExUnit provides many different assertion macros from the ExUnit.Assertion module. We’ll focus on the following common assertions.
- assert/1 check if a value is truthy.
- refute/1 check if a value is falsy.
- assert_raise/2 check if the code raises an error.
assert/1
We can use the assert/1 macro provided by ExUnit to assert that a value is truthy. Any truthy value makes the test pass.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule AssertExampleTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "assert examples" do
assert true
assert fn -> 2 end
assert []
assert 1
assert %{}
end
end
ExUnit.run()
assert/1 fails when provided a falsy value nil
or false
.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule FailingTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "failing test" do
assert false
end
end
ExUnit.run()
assert/2 accepts a message as the second argument, which will display a message if the test fails.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule FailingTestWithMessage do
use ExUnit.Case
test "failing example" do
assert false, "This message will display for a failing test."
end
end
ExUnit.run()
refute/2
The refute/2 macro is the opposite of the assert/2 macro. It checks that a value is falsy (nil
or false
).
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule RefuteExampleTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "refute examples" do
refute false
refute not true
refute !5
refute is_map(4)
end
end
ExUnit.run()
refute/2
also displays a message if the test fails.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule RefuteTruthyValueTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "failing example" do
refute true, "This message will display for a failing test."
end
end
ExUnit.run()
Practical Assertions
Since assert/2 tests if a value is truthy, we can use it with operators to write assertions against the output of a function.
Comparison Operators
For example, we might use comparison operators (==
, ===
, >=
, >
, <=
, <
) to compare our received value with the expected value.
Let’s put this to practice with a double/1
function.
flowchart LR
2 --> d1[double/1] --> 4
3 --> d2[double/1] --> 6
defmodule Number do
def double(number) do
number * 2
end
end
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule NumberTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "double/1" do
assert Number.double(2) == 4
assert Number.double(3) == 6
end
end
ExUnit.run()
Match Operator
It’s also common to use the match operator =
to check if the value matches a specific pattern.
map = %{one: 1, two: 2}
%{one: _} = map
Here’s that put to practice. Normally we shouldn’t test elixir functions, but we’ll use Map.merge/2 for the sake of example.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule MapMergeTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "merge/2" do
assert %{one: _value} = Map.merge(%{one: 1}, %{two: 2})
end
end
ExUnit.run()
The test-based match operator =~
can test if a string contains a value.
string = "hello world"
string =~ "hello"
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule StringContainsTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "string contains hello" do
string = "hello world"
string =~ "hello"
end
end
ExUnit.run()
There are also many built-in functions, such as is_map
, is_list
, is_integer
, and more which we can use to assert some
property of the value under test.
These operators and functions can combine with assert
to make more useful assertions.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule AssertionExampleTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "practical assertions example" do
# comparison operators
assert 2 == 2.0
assert 2.0 === 2.0
assert 1 < 2
assert 2 > 1
assert 2 >= 2
assert 2 <= 2
# match operator
assert %{one: _} = %{one: 1, two: 2}
assert [one: _, two: _] = [one: 1, two: 2]
assert {_, _, _} = {1, 2, 3}
assert [1 | _tail] = [1, 2, 3]
# functions
assert is_integer(2)
assert is_map(%{})
# text-based match operator
assert "hello world" =~ "hello"
assert "hello world" =~ ~r/\w+/
end
end
ExUnit.run()
Assertions that use an operator provide a :left
and :right
value for feedback.
Generally, :left
should be the received value for the system under test, and :right
should be the expected value
for the system under test.
1) test left/right == example (LeftRightExampleTest)
reading/exunit.livemd#cell:6
Assertion with == failed
code: assert 4 == 5
left: 4
right: 5
stacktrace:
reading/exunit.livemd#cell:7: (test)
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule LeftRightExampleTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "left/right == example" do
assert 4 == 5
end
test "left/right > example" do
assert 4 > 5
end
test "left/right =~ example" do
assert "hello world" =~ "non-matching pattern"
end
end
ExUnit.run()
Test Driven Development
Many developers follow a practice of TDD (Test Driven Development), where they write the test for their feature before writing the implementation.
These developers would likely claim that TDD leads to better-tested code, simpler interfaces, and other benefits. However, other developers use different approaches, and it’s possible to take TDD too far or use it for the wrong situation.
It’s for you to make up your own mind about TDD, and this course aspires to be unbiased. However, we do believe that it’s beneficial for you to understand TDD so that it can be a tool in your toolbox should you choose to use it.
TDD has three main phases, often called Red, Green, and Refactor.
- Red: Write a failing test.
- Green: Write the code to make the test pass.
- Refactor: Improve and optimize your code without changing the behavior.
You will have the opportunity to practice TDD throughout this course. For a deeper dive on TDD and testing, you might consider watching this video by Ian Cooper. It’s over an hour and completely optional.
YouTube.new("https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ05e7EMOLM")
Example-Based Testing
Above, we’ve demonstrated example-based testing, in that we provide a single example of input and output, and assume that the system under test continues to behave as expected.
However, there are a potentially infinite number of inputs and outputs for the Math.add/2
function.
Is it safe to assume that a single example comprehensively tests all inputs?
for int1 <- 1..3, int2 <- 1..3 do
[input: int1, input: int2, output: int1 + int2]
end
|> Kino.DataTable.new()
For example, we can make our NumberTest
pass with a fake solution.
defmodule FakeNumber do
def double(number) do
if number == 2 do
4
else
6
end
end
end
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule FakeNumberTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "double/1" do
assert FakeNumber.double(2) == 4
assert FakeNumber.double(3) == 6
end
end
ExUnit.run()
Robustness
A robust test ensures the code behaves correctly under many scenarios. To improve the robustness of our tests, we could write more example-based tests or more assertions in the same test.
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule RobustNumberTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "double/1" do
# now we catch that `FakeNumber` fails many test cases.
assert FakeNumber.double(2) == 4
assert FakeNumber.double(3) == 6
assert FakeNumber.double(4) == 8
assert FakeNumber.double(5) == 10
end
end
ExUnit.run()
This is more comprehensive. However, it’s still possible to fake the solution. In addition, if we continue this pattern, we will write more tests than necessary, which makes our test suite longer and potentially harder to maintain.
Types Of Test
There are three primary types of tests.
- Unit Test: tests that cover a single unit in isolation.
- Integration Tests tests that cover the integration of multiple components.
- End to End (E2E) tests that cover the whole system from start to finish.
So far, we have only seen examples of Unit Tests. In addition, the definition of a unit is often hotly debated in the programming community, so the lines between integration and unit tests can be blurry.
We’ll have the opportunity to see various types of tests. For now, it’s sufficient to be aware that there are multiple types.
For more on integration tests, consider reading Integration Tests, a blog post by Martin Fowler.
For end-to-end testing, you can take a look at the Wallaby project, which can test web applications by simulating realistic user interactions.
Test Suite Structure
We want to have confidence in our test suite so that as we add features, refactor, and otherwise change your codebase, we are not at risk of making breaking changes.
There are several schools of thought on how you should comprehensively test applications.
Many developers believe the Test Pyramid creates a fast and comprehensive test suite with many unit tests, some integration tests, and fewer end-to-end tests.
Alternatively, you might consider the Test Trophy, which prioritizes integration tests.
Rather than recommend a specific pattern, we hope to introduce you to them so that you can develop your own opinions and do further research.
Test Naming
Naming tests is important, but also highly subjective. There are some common patterns such as Given, When, Then.
In general, a good test name should capture:
- the system under test
- the state under test
- the desired behavior
All of the following would capture the desired information.
In our Number
module example that translates to:
- The Number Module
-
The input value (
2
) -
The expected output value (
4
)
test "double/1 with 2 returns 4"
We might omit the desired behavior from the test name, as it is also implicitly stated by the assertions in the test. By omitting the desired behavior, we prevent the test name from becoming outdated when the desired behavior changes, at the cost of possibly reducing the immediate clarity of our test.
So the following test name could be appropriate:
test "double/1 with 2"
Rather than dogmatically recommend a pattern, we’ll say that a good test name makes it easier to understand the goal of the test. How you do this is up to you, and many development teams develop different patterns.
Test Organization
We can group tests into a describe/2 block. A describe/2 block organizes tests by some commonality. For example, it’s common to group tests for a single function in the module under test together.
defmodule OrganizedNumber do
def double(number), do: number * 2
def triple(number), do: number * 3
end
ExUnit.start(auto_run: false)
defmodule OrganizedNumberTest do
use ExUnit.Case
describe "double/1" do
test "1 -> 2" do
assert OrganizedNumber.double(1) == 2
end
test "2 -> 4" do
assert OrganizedNumber.double(2) == 4
end
end
describe "triple/1" do
test "1 -> 3" do
assert OrganizedNumber.triple(1) == 3
end
test "2 -> 6" do
assert OrganizedNumber.triple(2) == 6
end
end
end
ExUnit.run()
ExUnit With Mix
Mix projects provide some conveniences when working with ExUnit.
Tests in a mix project are in the test/
folder. Generally there is an equivalent file in the test/
folder for each tested file in the lib
folder.
ExUnit is started for us in the test/test_helper.exs
file, and files in the test/
folder automatically compile, evaluate, and execute when we run tests.
We strongly recommend the Elixir Test extension for Visual Studio Code as it provides a number of useful commands for running tests in Elixir.
Run Tests
We can execute all tests by running the following from the command line in the project folder.
$ mix test
Run Tests In A File
We can run a single test file by providing its path.
$ mix test path/to/test/file.exs
For example, we can run the math_test.exs
file.
$ mix test test/math_test.exs
Run Tests By Line Number
We can execute a specific test or several tests under a describe
block by providing the line number.
$ mix test test/math_test.exs:5
Test Tags
We can use @moduletag
, @describetag
, and @tag
module attributes to tag our tests.
Once tagged, we can configure ExUnit to exclude, include, or only run tests with specific tags using ExUnit.configure/1.
@tag :my_tag
test "example test" do
assert false
end
Once tagged, we can use the flags --only
, --exclude
, and --include
to run specific tests.
$ mix test --exclude my_tag
Alternatively, we can place the ExUnit.configure/1 function in test_helpers.exs
.
ExUnit.start()
ExUnit.configure(exclude: :my_tag)
The :skip
tag is excluded by default. This is useful for skipping tests.
@tag :skip
test "example test" do
assert false
end
Further Reading
For more on testing, consider using the following resources.
-
Mix Test, for more on how you can use the
mix test
command. - ExUnit, for documentation on ExUnit.
- ElixirSchools: Documentation, an lesson by Elixir schools on documentation and doc-testing.
Commit Your Progress
DockYard Academy now recommends you use the latest Release rather than forking or cloning our repository.
Run git status
to ensure there are no undesirable changes.
Then run the following in your command line from the curriculum
folder to commit your progress.
$ git add .
$ git commit -m "finish ExUnit reading"
$ git push
We’re proud to offer our open-source curriculum free of charge for anyone to learn from at their own pace.
We also offer a paid course where you can learn from an instructor alongside a cohort of your peers. We will accept applications for the June-August 2023 cohort soon.